BBC Conspiracy Files 7/7

I missed this when it was broadcast and it's no longer available through IPlayer but luckily it's been posted on You Tube.
Unfortunately the program was a complete whitewash.
If this was meant to discredit John Hill I'm afraid it failed miserably.

The program stated as fact certain events that have never been proven to the public.
In fact the John Hill version is no less credible than the governments version.

The BBC had the opportunity to address some of the major concerns raised by the conspiracy theorists yet failed to do so.
As such it has played right into their hands giving rise to the suggestion that the BBC is part of the "plot".

Some of the questions the BBC skirted around were these.

1) Why were none of the CCTV cameras working at the stations where it's claimed the bombers boarded the trains? Co-incidence?
2) How was it that a training exercise was being carried out that day that involved the exact same stations? Co-incidence?
3) How did improvised home made bombs cause the kind of damage we have seen?
4) Why did the explosions seem to originate from beneath the trains?
5) Why was De Menezes killed so publicly and brutally yet no blame has been attributed to those responsible? In fact Cressida Dick was promoted.
6) Why were the shootings of the terrorists at Canary Wharf hushed up?
7) Not one witness has claimed to have seen any of the bombers boarding a train that day.
8) Why did the four bombers get return tickets to London if they were on a one-way suicide mission?

At the very least it's my belief that none of the four blamed for this atrocity were guilty.

Something else overlooked by the BBC is that it isn't just muslims who don't believe the governments version of events that day.
None of the videos I've watched on You Tube were created by muslims.
The tube bombings and the brutal execution of De Menezes are the main topic of discussion in my local, and it's my guess that it's the same elsewhere.

.