On 23rd April 1993, the Dorset Echo featured Peter Power on its front page:
LINK
Why was Superintendent Peter Power suspended from duty later to retire on health grounds?
Why did he leave a "Glittering Career" in the Met to join Dorset Police?
Tuesday 22 September 2009
Monday 21 September 2009
July 7th Truth Campaign
Please support the campaign to publish the truth..
LINK
As time goes on, questions remain unanswered, the political exploitation of the terrorist threat continues and we really should be questioning the events of that day as clearly they have become the foundation of a series of actions which could not have otherwise happened.
LINK
As time goes on, questions remain unanswered, the political exploitation of the terrorist threat continues and we really should be questioning the events of that day as clearly they have become the foundation of a series of actions which could not have otherwise happened.
Wednesday 16 September 2009
BBC Conspiracy Files 7/7
I missed this when it was broadcast and it's no longer available through IPlayer but luckily it's been posted on You Tube.
Unfortunately the program was a complete whitewash.
If this was meant to discredit John Hill I'm afraid it failed miserably.
The program stated as fact certain events that have never been proven to the public.
In fact the John Hill version is no less credible than the governments version.
The BBC had the opportunity to address some of the major concerns raised by the conspiracy theorists yet failed to do so.
As such it has played right into their hands giving rise to the suggestion that the BBC is part of the "plot".
Some of the questions the BBC skirted around were these.
1) Why were none of the CCTV cameras working at the stations where it's claimed the bombers boarded the trains? Co-incidence?
2) How was it that a training exercise was being carried out that day that involved the exact same stations? Co-incidence?
3) How did improvised home made bombs cause the kind of damage we have seen?
4) Why did the explosions seem to originate from beneath the trains?
5) Why was De Menezes killed so publicly and brutally yet no blame has been attributed to those responsible? In fact Cressida Dick was promoted.
6) Why were the shootings of the terrorists at Canary Wharf hushed up?
7) Not one witness has claimed to have seen any of the bombers boarding a train that day.
8) Why did the four bombers get return tickets to London if they were on a one-way suicide mission?
At the very least it's my belief that none of the four blamed for this atrocity were guilty.
Something else overlooked by the BBC is that it isn't just muslims who don't believe the governments version of events that day.
None of the videos I've watched on You Tube were created by muslims.
The tube bombings and the brutal execution of De Menezes are the main topic of discussion in my local, and it's my guess that it's the same elsewhere.
.
Unfortunately the program was a complete whitewash.
If this was meant to discredit John Hill I'm afraid it failed miserably.
The program stated as fact certain events that have never been proven to the public.
In fact the John Hill version is no less credible than the governments version.
The BBC had the opportunity to address some of the major concerns raised by the conspiracy theorists yet failed to do so.
As such it has played right into their hands giving rise to the suggestion that the BBC is part of the "plot".
Some of the questions the BBC skirted around were these.
1) Why were none of the CCTV cameras working at the stations where it's claimed the bombers boarded the trains? Co-incidence?
2) How was it that a training exercise was being carried out that day that involved the exact same stations? Co-incidence?
3) How did improvised home made bombs cause the kind of damage we have seen?
4) Why did the explosions seem to originate from beneath the trains?
5) Why was De Menezes killed so publicly and brutally yet no blame has been attributed to those responsible? In fact Cressida Dick was promoted.
6) Why were the shootings of the terrorists at Canary Wharf hushed up?
7) Not one witness has claimed to have seen any of the bombers boarding a train that day.
8) Why did the four bombers get return tickets to London if they were on a one-way suicide mission?
At the very least it's my belief that none of the four blamed for this atrocity were guilty.
Something else overlooked by the BBC is that it isn't just muslims who don't believe the governments version of events that day.
None of the videos I've watched on You Tube were created by muslims.
The tube bombings and the brutal execution of De Menezes are the main topic of discussion in my local, and it's my guess that it's the same elsewhere.
.
Who Blew Up The Tube on 7/7?
Like the majority of the British public I have never accepted the governments version of events on 7/7.
And now the Daily Mail has had the guts to speak out.
LINK
There are a number of videos on You Tube which question the governments version of events that day, most suggest the government staged it themselves to drum up support for the Iraq war.
Here's one that's attracting a lot of attention.
LINK
One thing I am absolutely certain about is the four named as the perpertrators could not have done it.
So who did?
Families of the victims and the survivors have a right to know the truth.
So how about it Mr Brown?
And now the Daily Mail has had the guts to speak out.
LINK
There are a number of videos on You Tube which question the governments version of events that day, most suggest the government staged it themselves to drum up support for the Iraq war.
Here's one that's attracting a lot of attention.
LINK
One thing I am absolutely certain about is the four named as the perpertrators could not have done it.
So who did?
Families of the victims and the survivors have a right to know the truth.
So how about it Mr Brown?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)